Drinking Water Testing & Treatment
|
|
| Home | Drinking Water| Drinking Water Testing | Drinking Water Treatment |Health & Wealth Website Links |
Under the standard of quality (165.110[b]), FDA establishes allowable levels for contaminants in bottled water. There are microbiological standards that set allowable coliform levels; physical standards that set allowable levels for turbidity, color and odor; and radiological standards that set levels for radium-226 and radium-228 activity, alpha-particle activity, and beta particle and photon radioactivity. The standard of quality also includes allowable levels for more than 70 different chemical contaminants. (For complete information on allowable levels for chemical or other contaminants, see 21 CFR 165.110[b].) Section 165.110(b) also lists methods that the FDA will use to determine whether bottled water samples comply with the quality standard. Bottlers are not required to use these methods in their own facilities; alternate methods are acceptable. Whatever method they use, bottlers are responsible for ensuring that their bottled water can pass the tests used by FDA in its own laboratories, should testing be performed by the FDA. What happens if bottled water contains a substance at a level greater than that allowed under the quality standard? Section 165.110(c) states that when the microbiological, physical, chemical or radiological quality of bottled water is below that prescribed in the quality standard, the label of the bottled water bottle must contain a statement of substandard quality, such as "Contains Excessive Bromate," "Contains Excessive Bacteria," or "Excessively Radioactive." However, including a label of substandard quality may not be sufficient. Regardless of whether bottled water bears a statement of substandard quality, it is considered adulterated if it contains a substance at a level considered injurious to health under section 402(a)(1) of the FFDCA. Another noteworthy point about section 165.110 is that it allows for the use of safe and suitable antimicrobial agents, such as ozone (see 21 CFR §184.1563 for details on ozone usage). The FDA does not specifically require that bottlers use antimicrobial agents in bottled water as long as the water is safe for human consumption. Inspection of Bottled Water PlantsFDA monitors and inspects bottled water products and processing plants under its general food safety program, not a specific bottled water program. Because FDA's experience over the years has shown that bottled water has a good safety record, bottled water plants generally are assigned low priority for inspection. The agency, however, inspects violative firms more frequently depending on the number, significance and recurrence of violations. In addition, FDA's field offices follow up on consumer and trade complaints and other leads, as appropriate, on potentially violative bottled water products. General information about what FDA inspectors look for during inspections can be found in the Investigations Operations Manual published by FDA's Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA). More detailed information about inspections of bottled water facilities can be found in the Guide to Inspections of Manufacturers of Miscellaneous Food Products, Volume II. Both of these documents can be accessed at www.fda.gov by following links to ORA and subsequently to inspection references. Specific items mentioned in the inspection guide for bottled water establishments include: (1) verifying that the plant's product water and operational water supply are obtained from an approved source; (2) checking whether any source claims on the label comply with the definitions in 165.110(a); (3) inspecting washing and sanitizing procedures; (4) inspecting the filling, capping, and sealing operations; and (5) determining whether the firms analyze their source water and product water for the chemical and microbiological contaminants listed in165.110(b) according to the required schedules. Sampling and TestingAs with other types of food, FDA periodically collects and analyzes samples of bottled water. Samples come from several different sources. Some samples are collected during inspections if the inspector's observations warrant collection to test for contaminants or if the bottled water facility has a previous history of contamination. Other samples are collected in response to trade or consumer complaints. Starting in FY 2003, bottled water samples will be collected as part of FDA's Total Diet Study. Finally, samples of foreign bottled water products offered for entry into the U.S. may be collected and tested to determine if they are in compliance with all applicable U.S. laws and FDA regulations. FDA laboratories may test the water for microbiological, radiological or chemical contamination. Individual samples are not tested for all possible contaminants cited in the quality standard, but for selected contaminants, depending on the reason for the sampling. For example, suspected microbiological contamination may result in microbiological analysis. (However, as noted, bottlers are required to maintain testing records to show to government inspectors for all the contaminants in the quality standard.) FDA also may review the labeling on bottled water samples.
State and Local RegulationsIn addition to the FDA, state and local governments also regulate bottled water. The FDA relies on state and local government agencies to approve water sources for safety and sanitary quality, as specified in part 129.3(a). Also, some states have regulations that differ from FDA's in content or coverage. For example, Texas requires water haulers transporting water in a tank truck or trailer to maintain a minimum chlorine residual of 0.5 mg/L in the water, whereas FDA does not have any specific regulations requiring chlorination of water.4 The International Bottled Water Association (IBWA), a trade association representing bottled water companies, also has developed a model code of regulations that its members must follow. Developing New Regulations at FDASection 410 of the FFDCA provides FDA with specific instructions on establishing quality standard regulations for bottled water in response to developments at EPA. Under section 410, when EPA establishes new maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) or treatment techniques for contaminants in public drinking water as part of a National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR), FDA is required to establish a standard of quality regulation for the same contaminants in bottled water, or to make a finding that such a regulation is not necessary to protect the public health because the contaminant is not present in water used for bottled drinking water. For treatment techniques, section 410 requires that bottled water be subject to requirements no less protective of the public health than those applicable to water from public water systems using the techniques required by EPA's NPDWRs. If FDA adopts an allowable level under the quality standard regulations, the level in bottled water must be no less stringent than EPA's MCL for drinking water; FDA's regulation must have the same effective date as EPA's regulation and must publish its regulation no later than 180 days before the effective date. These requirements will apply to EPA's recent regulatory activity on arsenic. In January 2001, EPA published a final rule lowering its standard for arsenic in public drinking water from 50 ppb to 10 ppb, effective January 2006. After further review of its revised standard for arsenic in drinking water, the EPA confirmed the 10 ppb standard on Oct. 31, 2001. As a result, FDA must establish a quality standard for arsenic in bottled water of 10 ppb or less, or make a finding that such regulation is not necessary, no later than 180 days before January 2006. An example of other recent regulatory activity by EPA is the final rule that established an MCL for uranium in drinking water, which is effective December 2003. FDA has generally adopted EPA's MCLs for contaminants in public drinking water as allowable levels for the same contaminants in the quality standard regulations for bottled water. However, in some cases, FDA standards for bottled water are different than EPA standards for public drinking water. Lead is an example. In 1991, EPA adopted a requirement that public water systems treat their water to reduce lead when lead levels consistently exceed 15 parts per billion (ppb). The 15 ppb level took into account the fact that lead appears in public drinking water from corrosion of public water distribution systems and residential plumbing. However, leaching of lead from distribution systems is not a factor for bottled water and, based on its survey data, FDA concluded that bottlers can readily produce bottled water products with lead levels below 5 ppb. In 1994, FDA adopted an allowable level for lead at 5 ppb as a bottled water quality standard regulation (59 FR 26933). This action was consistent with FDA's goal of reducing consumers' exposure to lead in drinking water to the extent practicable. Recent Regulatory ActivitiesDisinfectants and disinfection byproducts. In 2001, FDA adopted EPA's MCLs and maximum residual disinfectant levels (MRDLs) for four disinfection byproducts (bromate, chlorite, haloacetic acids and total trihalomethanes) and for three disinfectants (chloramine, chlorine and chlorine dioxide), respectively, as allowable levels in its standard of quality regulations for bottled water (66 FR 16858, March 28, 2001). FDA also revised the source water monitoring requirements in the CGMP regulations for bottled water to allow flexibility in testing for these seven contaminants in cases where they would not be expected to be found in source water. The Jan. 1, 2002 effective date for this regulation is the same as the effective date of EPA's regulations for the same contaminants in public drinking water. Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule. In a Federal Register notice of July 5, 2001 (66 FR 35439), FDA announced that it would not issue a standard of quality regulation in response to an EPA rule (63 FR 69477) establishing treatment technique requirements for improved control of Cryptosporidium in public drinking water obtained from surface water or ground water under the influence of surface water. FDA concluded that such a regulation is not necessary to protect the public health because bottled water is produced either from ground water that is not under the influence of surface water (see the definition in 165.110(a)(2)[ii]) or from water from public water systems, which is already treated according to EPA standards. Therefore, source waters used for bottling are not expected to contain Cryptosporidium. Bottled Water Feasibility Study. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act Amend-ments of 1996 (Section 114[b]), FDA was required to publish for notice and comment a draft study and a final study on the feasibility of appropriate methods of informing consumers about the contents of bottled water. FDA published a notice requesting comments on this issue on Nov. 12, 1997 (62 FR 60721) and a draft feasibility study on Feb. 22, 2000 (65 FR 8718). Based on comments, FDA published a final study report on Aug. 25, 2000 (65 FR 51833). The final study report evaluates information received from the comments and identifies appropriate and feasible methods for conveying information about the contents of bottled water to consumers. ConclusionBottled water is regulated as a food under the FFDCA by the FDA. Specific FDA regulations in the bottled water area cover CGMPs for bottled water production and a standard of identity and quality for bottled water. Recent regulatory activity on bottled water includes adoption of allowable levels of certain disinfectants and disinfection byproducts in the quality standard for bottled water and publication of a feasibility study on the appropriate methods for providing consumers with information on the contents of bottled water. The frequency of questions on bottled water reflects public interest in this increasingly popular drink. By Lauren M. Posnick, Sc.D. and Henry Kim, Ph.D. Series Editor: Catherine "Kitty" Bailey, M.Ed. Lauren M. Posnick, Sc.D., is a consumer safety officer in the Regulatory Policy Branch of the Division of Plant Product Safety in the Office of Plant and Dairy Foods and Beverages, CFSAN, FDA. Henry Kim, Ph.D., is Chief of the Regulatory Policy Branch, which oversees regulatory policy for plant-derived foods, as well as for bottled water. References
REPRODUCED FROM FOOD SAFETY MAGAZINE, AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2002, WITH PERMISSION OF THE PUBLISHERS. © 2002 BY THE TARGET GROUP. --------------------------- | |||||||||||||||||
Read why &
how non-toxic, natural
MoldZyme beats bleach in mold removal to easily,
USA
Income Tax Planning
This website is owned and operated by
the iPay, Ltd.
Copyright © 2004-2006. All
rights are reserved. |